Skip to main content

Ephesians 1:3–4 - God’s Gracious Choosing

Introduction

Paul’s letter to the Ephesians is a letter of great importance for the Christian faith. Its rich theology places emphasis on the role of Christ in our redemption. Specifically, Paul’s focus is a believer’s union with Christ in his death, resurrection, exaltation, and enthronement (1:2–23; 2:5–6).[1] It is in Christ that a believer receives all the spiritual blessings from God. And ultimately, God’s plan in Christ is “to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth” (1:10).

Verses 3 and 4 will be the focus of this essay, asking and answering some key questions generated from examining the text, with support from the Christian Tradition in understanding these passages. First, let’s read the text:

Ephesians 1:3–4

3 Blessed is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavens in Christ.
4 For he chose us in him, before the foundation of the world, to be holy and blameless in love before him.

Before getting into these two passages, we need to set up the context.

These two passages are part of one, long sentence (1:3–14). Throughout this chapter, Paul aims to show God’s rich blessings on “the faithful saints in Christ Jesus at Ephesus,” which apply to all the saints in Christ. Paul arranges this chapter’s material designated by four uses of the phrase “in him,” denoting the blessing that has been given to the saints in Christ. Some have observed a Trinitarian distinction in these passages, whereby vv. 3­–6 is the work of the Father, 7–10 is the work of the Son, and 11–14 is the work of the Spirit.[2] Below is a breakdown of the main 4 points (observe the In him markers) of this section, with sub-points that detail and support the main points.

1.          In him: According to the good pleasure of his will and praise of his glorious grace, God the Father chose the saints before the foundation of the world.

a.           . . . to be holy and blameless before him

b.          . . . to be predestined us for adoption as sons

2.          In him: We have received redemption

                                                                                              i.         . . . through his blood

                                                                                          ii.         . . . the forgiveness of our trespasses

                                                                                       iii.         . . . according to the riches of his grace

1.          . . . that he richly poured out on us

a.           . . . with all wisdom and understanding

b.          He made known to us the mystery of his will

                                                                                              i.         . . . according to his good pleasure

1.          . . . that he purposed in Christ

a.           . . . as a plan for the right time

c.           — to bring everything together in Christ

                                                                                              i.         . . . both things in heaven and things on earth

d.          . . . in him.

3.          In him: We have received an inheritance

a.           . . . because we were predestined

                                                                                              i.         . . . according to the plan of the one who works out everything in agreement with the purpose of his will

1.          . . . so that we who had already put or hope in Christ might bring praise to his glory.

4.          In him: You were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit

a.           . . . when you heard the word of truth

                                                                                              i.         . . . the gospel of your salvation

                                                                                          ii.         . . . and when you believed

b.          The Holy Spirit is the down payment of our inheritance

                                                                                              i.         . . . until the redemption of the possession

1.          . . . to the praise of his glory.

The four main points we see in the passages above show us that God in Christ has chosen us to receive redemption and an inheritance, which he guarantees in sealing us with the Holy Spirit, which is through the hearing and believing the gospel, the word of truth. Let’s now examine 1:3–4.

Ephesians 1:3–4

3 Blessed is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavens in Christ.
4 For he chose us in him, before the foundation of the world, to be holy and blameless in love before him.

Paul extols God, blessing him as the source of our blessedness, following the familiar pattern we see in Israel’s Scriptures and the Jewish literature of the Second Temple Period. See Neh 9:5–7, where Nehemiah writes that the Levites all stood up in confession to God praising him, “Blessed be the LORD your God from everlasting to everlasting. . . . You, LORD, are the only God. You created the heavens and the highest heavens , . . the earth and all that is on it, the seas and all that is in them. You give life to all of them”. We see this blessing toward God in Ps 72:19, Dan 4:34; 2 Cor 1:3; 1 Pet 1:3.

Paul’s opening line, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” raises the issue of Christ’s deity in that the Father is said to be his God. To fill this out, we look to other passages that speak of his deity and equality with the Father. For example, John 1:1, 14, 18; 5:17–27; 20:28, Phil 2:6, Col 1:19; 2:9; Heb 1:3, 8; 2 Pet 1:1; 1 John 5:20; 2 John 9. I emphasize these passages because they speak to Christ’s divinity, showing he performs the same divine actions attributed to God the Father, whereas his humanity is generally assumed and not debatable. John 20:17 is instructive, hearing from Jesus’ mouth his reference to God as his God. Therefore, simply put, Jesus as man should refer to God as his God. But Paul’s emphasis is on the unfolding of the divine purpose, God the Father is working out his eternal plan, within the sphere of divine blessing given and received in God the Son, the Lord Christ.[4] There is a distinction made between God the Father and the Son in this blessing, which the Christian tradition has continued to follow in its interpretation of this passage. In Paul’s blessing to “God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” God is the blessed God, creator of heaven and earth, who is the Father of the Son—the Word, who assumed flesh in the person of Jesus Christ. And in him all spiritual blessings are received.

Early Church Father, Jerome (c. 347 – 420 AD), writes, “. . . both God and Father are to be referred in common to our Lord. Blessed is the God of the man who has been assumed [i.e., the Word who assumed flesh] and the father of him who was the Word of God with God in the beginning!”[5] And Chrysostom (c. 347–407 AD) observes Paul is speaking of God as “[t]he God of him that was Incarnate.”[6] And later, we see a more theologically precise interpretation. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 AD) notes, “He who is God by the divine essence and Father because of his property of generating [the Son]. The copula and is not placed between God and Father to designate two separate persons, for there is only one Father, but to denote what he is by his essence and what he is in relation to the Son.”[7] Reformed Puritan, David Dickson (c. 1583–1663), writes, Paul “calls him the Father of Jesus Christ 1) because of the eternal generation of the Son, by which the Father from all eternity communicated to him his whole infinite essence; 2) because of the personal union of the assumed human nature, by which the Son of man is made the Son of God.”[8] The point in this blessing is not to identify two gods, otherwise Paul would be a heretic, “but to identify the one God and God’s particular relationship as Father of the Son.”[9] And the “divine saving purposes from eternity to eternity which are celebrated in Ephesians 1:3–14 are clearly set forth as the work of the triune God.”[10]

Regarding Ephesians 1:3, other passages widen our understanding of the phrase in the heavens. We see “the heavens” is a cosmic place, a realm of sorts with spiritual beings, “rulers and authorities” (Eph 3:10) “cosmic powers of darkness, evil, and spiritual forces” (Eph 6:12), which is contrasted with “flesh and blood.” And Christ was raised by God and seated “at his right hand in the heavens” (Eph 1:20), in which the saints have also been raised up and are “seated with Christ in the heavens in Christ” (Eph 2:6). Interestingly, our being raised and seated shows to be something already certain and complete.[11] And it is God’s purpose in revealing the mystery of Christ “through the church to the rulers and authorities in the heavens” (Eph 3:10). The spiritual blessings we receive, which we see expressed in vv. 3–14, are “creation, redemption, justification, forgiveness of sin, and life everlasting, of no other but of Christ and by no other means but for Christ’s sake.”[12] Calvin observes in the heavens is “intended to express the superiority of grace which we receive through Christ. The happiness which it bestows is not in this world, but in heaven and everlasting life.”[13]

As it pertains to 1:4, other passages support a consistent understanding of God’s choosing us. 2 Thessalonians 2:13–14 is like this verse, as almost a restatement. He writes, “God chose you from the beginning for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth.” And from a different pen, the Apostle Peter, expresses similar notions when he writes: “who are chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father by being set apart by the Spirit for obedience and for sprinkling with Jesus Christ’s blood” (1 Peter 1:1–2). We see that God’s choosing was from “before the foundation of the world,” “from the beginning,” and “according to God’s foreknowledge.” Calvin comments:

The foundation and first cause, both of our calling and of all the benefits which we receive from God, is here declared to be his eternal election. If the reason is asked, why God has called us to enjoy the gospel, why he daily bestows upon us so many blessings, why he opens to us the gate of heaven,—the answer will be constantly found in this principle, that he hath chosen us before the foundation of the world. The very time when the election took place proves it to be free; for what could we have deserved, or what merit did we possess, before the world was made?[14]

And we were called “to be holy and blameless,” “for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit,” and “by being set apart by the Spirit for obedience and for sprinkling with Jesus Christ’s blood.” Other passages tell us God’s actions in Christ make us holy and blameless: he protects us from stumbling to make us “stand in the presence of his glory, without blemish” (Jude 24); he gave himself unto death “to present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle , . . but holy and blameless” (Eph 5:27); his giving of himself “reconciled [us] . . . to present [us] holy, faultless, and blameless before him—” (Col 1:22). Later in First Peter, he says to those God chose, that “you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people of his own” (2:9). And in Matthew, Jesus speaks of a “kingdom prepared for you [the righteous] from the foundation of the world” as their inheritance (25:34).

Commentators from the Tradition rightly emphasize God as the sole and primary cause of our salvation. Of election, Aquinas writes, “it is free; as he chose us in him; it is eternal, before the foundation of the world; it is fruitful, that we should be holy; and it is gratuitous, in love.”[15] And in doing so, Christians can be comforted in trials and battles with sin, knowing that the grace bestowed upon them is irrevocable. They “can rest assured and even boast in the face of Satan because they have been chosen [by God] from eternity. The Lord cared about you before the world was made, before you ever existed, so how much more will he care about you now that the world has been created and you have appeared in it?”[16]

God’s choosing us in him, Calvin writes,

is the second proof that the election is free; for if we are chosen in Christ, it is not of ourselves. It is not from a perception of anything that we deserve, but because our heavenly Father has introduced us, through the privilege of adoption, into the body of Christ. In short, the name of Christ excludes all merit, and everything which men have of their own; for when he says that we are chosen in Christ, it follows that in ourselves we are unworthy.[17]

While some may think the doctrine of election is an article of the faith that shouldn’t be talked about, Paul’s approach to the topic puts those assumptions to bed. How is that? Paul speaks of it in a celebratory expression of praise, in which he says our Creator is blessed for such a spiritual blessing. Paul blesses God because God has blessed believers (v.3), predestined them for sonship (v.5), and has made known to them the mystery of his will (v.9).[18] Election is the means to which God in Christ guarantees our salvation. Apart from being united in Christ, through the working of God who made us alive with Christ (Eph 2:5; col 2:13), our faith would determine to fail. Paul can only say, “I am sure of this, that he who started a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus” (Phil 1:6), because of God’s elective purposes in choosing a people to be holy and blameless. Israel serves as a reminder about God’s purposes in electing them out of all the peoples of the earth (Deut 7:6), to be a holy people for his own possession. Scripture says, “The LORD set his heart on [them] and chose them . . . because he loved [them] and kept the oath [he] swore to [their] ancestors” (Deut 7:7–8). It had nothing to do with a foreseen faith, holiness, and blameless conduct of their own that determined their being chosen; rather, it was because of God’s gracious will and faithfulness to his promise.

~ Romans 11:36 ~


___________________

[1] Benjamin J. Merkle, “Ephesians” in Iain M. Duguid, James M. Hamilton, and Jay Sklar, ESV Expository Commentary: Ephesians-Philemon (Crossway, 2018), 21.
[2] James Montgomery Boice, Ephesians, 9.
[3] Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, ed. Frederick William Danker, 3rd edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).
[4] Peter T. O’Brien, The Letter to the Ephesians (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1999), 91.
[5] Jerome, Epistle to the Ephesians, 1.1.3.
[6] John Chrysostom, “Comm. and Homilies on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Ephesians,” in NPNF 1.13, 50.
[7] Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Ephesians, 27.
[8] Gerald L. Bray, Galatians, Ephesians, Reformation Commentary on Scripture. Logos Edition (InterVarsity Press, 2011), 239–40.
[9] Stephen E. Fowl, Ephesians: A Commentary, ed. C. Clifton Black, M. Eugene Boring, and John T. Carroll, First Edition, The New Testament Library (Westminster John Knox Press, 2012), 37.
[10] O’Brien, The Letter to the Ephesians, 91.
[11] Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics, Enlarged edition (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1997), 563–4. The Greek form of the verb is called a proleptic (futuristic) aorist, denoting the certainty of the action, though future, that has happened to us.
[12] Lancelot Ridley, “Commentary on Ephesians,” in Bray, Galatians, Ephesians, 238.
[13] John Calvin, Comm. Ephesians, 197.
[14] John Calvin, Comm. Ephesians, 197–8.
[15] Aquinas, Ephesians, 27.
[16] Johannes Brenz, “Commentary on Ephesians,” in Bray, Galatians, Ephesians, 240.
[17] John Calvin, Comm. Ephesians, 198.
[18] Frank Thielman, Ephesians, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic, 2010), 41.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gregory of Nyssa: Trinity–Not Tri-deity

Gregory, a bishop of Nyssa in 371, was part of the Cappadocian trio, and was instrumental in the development of Trinitarian orthodoxy. His theological prowess proved vital in response to the Arian and Sabellian heresies. Key to Gregory’s theology we find “an emergence of a pro-Nicene ‘grammar’ of divinity through his developed account of divine power,” [1] conceived through a nature-power-activity formulation revealed in the created order and articulated in Scripture. Understanding the Triune God in this manner afforded a conception of the Trinity that was logical and thoroughly biblical. And this letter is paradigmatic on Gregory’s account of the divine nature. (* This article was later published with Credo Magazine, titled, “ The Grammar of Divinity (On Theology). ” See link below) To Ablabius, though short, is a polemical address whereby Gregory lays out a complex argument in response to the claim that three Divine Persons equal three gods. Basically put, Ablabius (his opponent,

St. John Chrysostom — for God is simple

Below is part of the introductory section to my exposition of John Chrysostom’s doctrine of God. I posted it because I thought it was fascinating to find such an important theologian known for avoiding (even having a disdain of) speculative theology refer to the classical doctrine of divine simplicity as common place in his thoroughly biblical doctrine of God. Toward the end I include a link to my full exposition. John Chrysostom (ca. 347–407) was the archbishop of Constantinople. Being the most prolific of all the Eastern fathers, he fought against the ecclesiastical and political leaders for their abuse of authority. He was called Chrysostom (meaning “golden-mouthed”) for his eloquent sermons. [1] This most distinguished of Greek patristic preachers excelled in spiritual and moral application in the Antiochene tradition of literal exegesis, largely disinterested, even untutored in speculative and controversial theology. [2] On the Incomprehensible Nature of G

John 17:3 – Eternal Life is Knowing God and Christ–the One, True God

    John 17:1–5. “ Jesus spoke these things, looked up to heaven, and said, “Father, the hour has come. Glorify your Son so that the Son may glorify you, since you gave him authority over all people, so that he may give eternal life to everyone you have given him. This is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and the one you have sent—Jesus Christ. I have glorified you on the earth by completing the work you gave me to do. Now, Father, glorify me in your presence with that glory I had with you before the world existed .”

A Brief Exposition of Augustine's Doctrine of Divine Immutability

To much of the Western world, Augustine has no rival. He is the preeminent—uninspired—theologian of the Christian faith. When reading the titans of the church—i.e., Aquinas, Luther, and Calvin—Augustine’s theology and ideas are voluminously parroted all throughout their writings. His influence is unparalleled. Even the secular world sees Augustine as a mammoth figure in the shaping of human history. And its Augustine’s doctrine of God we will divert our attention to, looking specifically at his articulation of divine immutability Augustine’s doctrine of God is classical, through and through. He writes, “There is One invisible, from whom, as the Creator and First Cause, all things seen by us derive their being: He is supreme, eternal, unchangeable, and comprehensible by none save Himself alone” ( Ep . 232.5).[1] When reading his works, the doctrine of immutability is paramount, coming forth repeatedly. For Augustine, immutability, or God’s unchangeableness, is consequential

Gregory of Nazianzus: The Trinity - Not a Collection of Elements

Gregory of Nazianzus   One of the Cappadocian fathers, Gregory of Nazianzus (c.330–389), given the title, “The Theologian,” was instrumental in the development of the doctrine of the Trinity, specifically the distinct terms to describe the Persons of the Godhead (Unbegotten, eternally begotten, and procession). Gregory’s main contribution to the development of Christology was in his opposition to Apollinarius. He argued that when Adam fell, all of humanity fell in him; therefore, that fallen nature must be fully united to the Son—body, soul, and mind; ‘for the unassumed is the unhealed’.   Gregory’s Doctrine of the Trinity His clearest statement on the Trinity is found in his Oration 25.15–18. Oration 25 is part of a series of sermons delivered in 380. As a gesture of gratitude, Gregory dedicates Oration 25 to Christian philosopher Maximus the Cynic, as a sort of ‘charge’ for him to push forward and remain strong in the orthodox teachings of the faith. And these sections are that or

First Timothy 2:12 - On Women in the Pastorate - A Critical Response to Nijay Gupta

Does 1 Timothy 2:12 prohibit women from leading and preaching over men in the church? I recently posted an article examining an approach to this question, specifically evaluating interpretive consistency. In the article, I looked at two passages that appealed to the Old Testament to support the claim being made in the text. The point of the blog post was to shed light on an inconsistency of interpretation by looking at one common argument from the Bible in favor of women in the pastorate and another biblical argument supporting the view of monogamous marriage, between one man and one woman. My general observation is that many Christians who advance this particular argument, allowing for women in the pastorate, also affirm the particular argument for the biblical view of marriage. They both have the same methodological starting point; however, both arrive at their conclusions in completely different ways, demonstrating interpretive inconsistency, which I conclude ste

Ambrose: A Nicene Defense of Jesus Not Knowing the Day or the Hour ~ Mark 13:32

Ambrose (c. 339–397), was Bishop of Milan (northern Italy). His name is familiar to many because of Augustine, in that it was through Ambrose’s preaching that Augustine was saved by the gospel. Ambrose was a rigorous exponent of Nicene orthodoxy, and as with his other contemporaries, he was an ardent opponent against Arianism. His works, therefore, were aimed at refuting Arian heresy, paying special attention to the exposition and defense of the divinity of Christ and the Trinity. In his most prominent work, The Exposition of the Christian Faith (abbr. De fide ), Ambrose makes a lucid, scripturally saturated articulation of the Christian faith couched in Nicene orthodoxy. De fide is devoted to proving the full divinity of Christ, co-equal in substance, wisdom, power, and glory as God the Father, derived through elucidating the plain sense of the text. Ambrose’s aim is polemical and apologetic, addressing and refuting objections from the Arians. This post will ex

Isaiah 45:7 - “ . . . I make peace, and create evil.” — Does God create evil?

My daughter watched a video this morning where a deconstructionist, an ex vangelical, was attempting to profane the goodness of God, by pointing out that Isaiah 45:7 says God creates evil. She was referring to the KJV version of this passage which says, “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” So, what do we do with that? Below is a brief response. Proper biblical interpretation considers context when seeking the meaning of a passage. Furthermore, when it comes to difficult or obscure passages, a helpful rule of interpretation is to look to the plainer passages of the Bible and draw examples from them to shed light on the more obscure passages ( thanks Augustine ). We let Scripture interpret Scripture. The point is to remove all hesitation on doubtful passages. So, in this passage, on the face it seems to imply that God creates evil, thus making God evil. But is that what the Bible teaches about God? The plainer passages te

Boethius: The Logic of Unity and Plurality in One God

In the “Introduction” to a standard English translation of Boethius’ Theological Tractates and the Consolation of Philosophy , it is stated that “Boethius was the last of the Roman philosophers, and the first of the scholastic theologians” (X).  Philosophy is aimed at explaining the nature of the world ( the natural ). Theology’s aim is to understand and explain doctrines delivered by divine revelation ( the supernatural ). Boethius was the seminal figure in preparing the way for the synthesis of these two disciplines, with philosophy serving the task of theology (i.e., the handmaiden to the King of sciences) .

Piper vs. Calvin: The Role of Good Works in Salvation

In his book Future Grace , John Piper writes, “Faith alone is the instrument that unites us to Christ who is our righteousness and the ground of our justification. But the purity of life that confirms faith’s reality is also essential for final salvation , not as the ground of our right standing, but as the fruit and evidence that we are vitally united by faith to Christ who alone is the ground of our acceptance with God.” [1] His purpose in writing that statement is to “explode the great error that says . . . [y]ou get your justification by faith, and you get your sanctification by works. You start the Christian life in the power of the Spirit, you press on in the efforts of the flesh.” [2] The emphasized portion above (and other such statements) has raised critical concerns over Piper’s Reformed theology in that his words seem to veer away from orthodox Reformed teaching. These critics contend Piper teaches a two-stage justification where one is “ initially justified by grace alon